Explicit criteria
Define which suites must be green for merge vs. for store upload—avoid silent waivers.
← Back to use cases
SEO Page
Android testing workflow
A clear workflow turns ad-hoc checks into a repeatable pipeline: who runs what, on which environments, and when results block a release. Combine it with testing workflows documentation and framework choices your team already uses.
Typical stages
- Local: unit and fast lint on the developer machine.
- CI: automated UI/API tests on consistent agents or emulators.
- Pre-release: broader device matrix, exploratory passes, sign-off.
- Post-release: crash and ANR monitoring feeding back into the next cycle.
Keep the pipeline honest
Stable fixtures
Tests need deterministic accounts, feature flags, and backends so failures point to real regressions.
Reproduce fast
When CI fails, use debug tooling and reproduction playbooks before rerunning expensive suites.
How Device Changer fits
Shared device profiles align developers, QA, and automation on the same definition of “green”.
Interface screenshots
FAQ
Should manual QA stay in the workflow?
Yes—for UX, edge cases, and exploratory passes automation still misses—just time-box it after automated gates pass.
Where does performance testing sit?
Run lightweight perf checks on key builds; deeper performance testing on release candidates.